Blog Menu

Archive for the ‘Lawsuits’ Category


Shareholder Jayne Conroy Plays Major Role on Corn Litigation Plaintiff's Executive Committee

Earlier this year, my colleague, shareholder Jayne Conroy was appointed to the Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee (PEC) for the pending multidistrict litigation (MDL) against Syngenta Seeds Inc. concerning its genetically modified corn. Farmers and farm businesses are actively filing lawsuits against Syngenta, with more than 360 filed in 20 states, so far.

JConroy_WebJayne is playing a major role on the corn litigation Plaintiff’s Executive Committee, as additional cases are being transferred into the consolidated federal docket in Kansas City. As Jayne said in an Associated Press article, more lawsuits may be filed as the federal judge continues to organize the cases.

“They are still filing all the time,” said Conroy in the article, which was picked up by multiple newspapers, including the New York Times. “I have many clients that are not filed yet. We are gathering the data.”

In regards to how long farmers and farm businesses have to file lawsuits against Syngenta, there is still time.

“There’s no deadline at this point,” she said.

Lawsuits are being filed for loss of profits and a depressed corn market due to the rejection of Syngenta’s Viptera MIR 162 corn trait, which lasted for four years. In late 2014, China finally approved the corn trait for import, which is good news for American farmers for multiple reasons. This change in approval could help the market to recover – but it also could help U.S. farmers and exporters reach settlements with the company for damaging the U.S. corn market.

Jayne has served in leadership positions of more than a dozen multidistrict litigations. Since 2006, she is credited with orchestrating the settlements of thousands of cases for a total recovery for the firm’s clients of more than $500 million. Conroy also has represented several thousand victims of the Sept. 11, 2001, tragedy in a multidistrict action against the financial sponsors of terrorism.

Learn more about filing a GMO corn lawsuit.

No Comments


Questions to Ask When Choosing a Mesothelioma Lawyer

When searching for a mesothelioma law firm to hire, it is important to ask the right questions. The Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization (ADAO), an independent nonprofit dedicated to improving public health by preventing asbestos-related diseases and protecting the rights of asbestos victims, compiled a list of the top 10 questions to ask when hiring a mesothelioma lawyer.

Mesothelioma lawsuits can help families cover medical expenses and hold companies accountable for their negligence. Working with the right law firm for your situation can ensure a smooth and positive experience. Read the following questions from ADAO before meeting with a mesothelioma attorney to ensure you’re hiring the best lawyer for you.

  1. How many mesothelioma cases do you take each year?
  2. How long have you been trying mesothelioma cases?
  3. If my case goes to trial, will you be representing me in court?
  4. Have you tried a case to jury verdict recently, and if so, what was the result?
  5. How many of your mesothelioma cases were settled, and how many went to trial?
  6. How many of your verdicts withstood appeal?
  7. Does your firm list jury verdicts? If so, where?
  8. What is your average time to resolution in mesothelioma cases?
  9. What are my expected costs of pursuing the litigation?
  10. Does your firm donate to increase awareness and fund research?

These questions are important to ask during an initial consultation because they provide a clear picture of a firm and its background. Additionally, a reputable mesothelioma law firm will be able to provide straight forward answers to these questions. If the law firm you’re considering cannot answer them, you may want to keep looking. Hiring a mesothelioma law firm can be a daunting process. Using these questions will help you choose the best mesothelioma attorney for your specific situation.

It is natural to have many questions and concerns when pursuing a mesothelioma lawsuit. This is a complex area of the law. Simmons Hanly Conroy is committed to helping mesothelioma patients obtain the right legal help—no matter what firm they hire. Contact a mesothelioma lawyer today to discuss these questions and get started on your initial consultation.

No Comments


Simmons Hanly Conroy Investigates Legal Rights of Car Owners Impacted by GM Recall

Illinois and Missouri residents who have owned or leased one of the vehicles related to the recall of General Motor cars with ignition problems may be able to hold the automaker accountable for their defective vehicles. The Firm is currently investigating the legal rights of consumers who have been impacted by the GM recall.

In February and March, GM issued three recalls, the most recent on March 28, for a combined 2.6 million vehicles with possible ignition switch defects. Specifically, the faulty ignition switches slipped from the “run” to “accessory” position while the vehicle was in motion. This would cause the engine to stall, lose power and disable the brakes, power steering and airbags. A study commissioned by The Center for Auto Safety reviewed data compiled from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration accident reports and linked more than 300 deaths to failed airbags in two of the recalled models.

In 2006, a 2005 Chevy Cobalt’s ignition switch slipped into accessory position and killed two teenage girls. Investigators discovered the car had shut off within five seconds before the crash, which caused the steering wheel to lock up, shut off the electrical power and disabled the airbags. The 2005 Chevy Cobalt hit a raised driveway and flow 40 feet in the air before hitting a telephone pole and two trees.

GM acknowledges it has linked the ignition switch defect to 13 deaths and 34 crashes in the Chevy Cobalt and the Saturn Ions. Additionally, GM customers are claiming their vehicles lost significant value because of the ignition problems.

Media reports assert that General Motors knew about the faulty ignitions since 2001. The automaker proposed and developed a solution by 2004, however GM decided against implementing the fix by 2005. The company continued to put the vehicles on the market with faulty ignition switches. Those vehicles included:

  • Chevrolet Cobalt, 2005-2010
  • Pontiac G5, 2007 – 2010
  • Saturn Ions, 2003-2007
  • Chevrolet HHRs, 2006-2011
  • Pontiac Solstice, 2006-2010
  • Saturn Sky, 2007 – 2010

Even though there have been numerous investigations, the question still remains among consumers – why did GM take so long to address such a serious problem?

Class action lawsuits have been filed to help individuals who own a recalled vehicle. The Simmons Hanly Conroy is currently investigating the legal rights of owners of the vehicles listed above. If you or someone you know owned a vehicle recalled by GM, learn more about filing a GM recall lawsuit or contact us today.

No Comments


Aging Ameren Power Plants in St. Louis Pose Air Pollution Risk to Residents

meramec-coal-plantThe St. Louis area relies on aging coal-burning power plants owned by Ameren to provide the majority of its power. These coal-burning plants generate tons of coal ash waste that put Missouri and Illinois residents’ health at risk.

Coal ash, or fly ash, is toxic waste that’s left after burning coal.  The storage and disposal of the coal ash can create environmental disasters such as what recently occurred in North Carolina.  Just last week, millions of gallons of the toxic waste poured into the Dan River in Eden, North Carolina thanks to a broken pipe. Duke Energy, the responsible party, and environmental regulators are scurrying to investigate the cause and to determine how to remove the waste and repair the local area.

In Missouri, coal ash has been handled a variety of ways. For instance, it has been stored in disposal ponds at the Meramec Energy Center in Oakville, the Labadie Energy Center in Franklin County and the Rush Island Energy Center in Jefferson County.

The disposal ponds can be unlined—meaning that the coal ash seeps undetected into the groundwater thereby potentially compromising drinking water supplies. The disposal ponds are located in flood plains of the Mississippi, Missouri and Meramec rivers, which together provide drinking water to nearly 60 percent of the state.

Beyond disposal ponds, coal ash has been injected into old limestone mines and illegally dumped, in addition to other ways to deal with the large volume of waste. The storage and disposal of waste can have a significant impact on the people who live near the storage and disposal facilities, especially when things go wrong.

Since 1992, the Sierra Club reported that the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MoDNR) has known that a 154-acre, unlined ash pond at Ameren’s Labadie coal-fired power plant has been leaking as much as 50,000 gallons a day. Yet, MoDNR has not required any groundwater monitoring or cleanup, despite the threat to local residents, according to the non-profit organization.

According to the EPA, coal ash contains arsenic, boron, chromium, mercury and other toxic chemicals. These substances are known to cause cancer, damage the nervous system, and aggravate existing breathing problems like asthma. Children are especially susceptible to the dangers of environmental pollution like coal ash, according to medical research.

Despite the health risks created by coal ash pollution, Ameren has put its bottom line above the health of its customers.

In 2011, an Ameren executive told the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, “if we went after the potential that we’ve seen in our own [energy efficient] study, we wouldn’t have to build another power plant for 20 years and we could retire Meramec and we’d be OK,” he said. But, “we’d lose $30 million a year. And we just can’t do that. It’s that simple.”

The Sierra Club has taken steps to hold Ameren accountable for its air pollution by serving notice of its intent to file a civil lawsuit this spring against the power company for alleged air pollution violations. Based on public records, the group received from MoDNR, more than 10,000 violations of air pollution regulations have allegedly occurred at the Meramec, Labadie and Rush Island plants.

Environmental attorneys at the Firm are currently investigating the rights of residents who live near the power plants and may have suffered physical injuries and property damages because of the pollution.

Learn more about filing a coal ash pollution lawsuit >>>

No Comments


Simmons Hanly Conroy Files First Testosterone Treatment Lawsuits, Bloomberg Reports

Yesterday, attorneys at the firm filed the first testosterone treatment lawsuit on behalf of five men against Abbott Laboratoes and AbbVie, Inc.

The men range in age from 50 to 63 and have either experienced a heart attack, stroke or mini-stroke after they started using AndroGel, according to the complaint.

The litigation, filed in federal court in Chicago, comes just days after the U.S. Food & Drug Administration announced the launch of an investigation into the risks of testosterone treatment drugs. Recent medical studies have found that men who take testosterone therapy face an increased risk of suffering heart attack, stroke and even death.

Bloomberg reported on the testosterone treatment lawsuit. Read the full article here.

The cases are Aurecchia v. AbbVie Inc. (ABBV), 14-cv-00772; Benn v. AbbVie, 14-cv-00774; Gallagher v. AbbVie Inc., 14-cv-00776; Marino v. AbbVie Inc., 14-cv-00777 and Myers v. AbbVie Inc., 14-cv-00780, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois (Chicago).

The law firm Morelli Alters Ratner LLP in New York is co-counsel.

No Comments

36 queries. 0.926 seconds