Dangerous Pharmaceutical Drugs and Medical Device Attorneys in St. Louis
Over the past decade, the attorneys at the Simmons Law Firm have represented thousands of victims of dangerous pharmaceutical drugs and medical devices. Our commitment to each one of our clients is to give them a voice – to help them stand up, speak out and receive the compensation they are entitled to.
With an office located in St. Louis, Missouri, the Simmons Law Firm is committed to giving each client the type of personal attention they deserve. We are a nationwide firm, this means that we travel to wherever our clients live. Whether you live in St. Louis or across the country, we will come to you, offering both our compassion and experience.
If you have questions about our pharmaceutical drug attorneys or need more information, please contact one of our
St. Louis attorneys today.
Why Contact Our St. Louis Dangerous Drug Attorneys
The Simmons Law Firm has represented thousands of pharmaceutical clients and recovered nearly $200 million in verdicts and settlements.* We have emerged as a leader in pharmaceutical law and our attorneys have developed concentrated practice areas.
This success in representing the victims of dangerous drugs and devices both in St. Louis and across the country has helped us continually make strides towards better serving our clients. We are here to answer your questions and walk you through the sometimes overwhelming world of pharmaceutical drug litigation. Beginning with a free consultation, our experienced dangerous drug lawyers will evaluate your case, answer your questions, and help you understand your legal rights.
If you or a loved one has been injured due to a dangerous drug or medical device, please
contact the attorneys at the Simmons Law Firm today.
Current Areas of Litigation
- Actos
- Transvaginal Mesh
- Depakote
- Propecia
- Topamax
- Birth Injuries
- Hip Implant Recalls
- Fentanyl
- Avandia
- Chantix
- Heparin
- Reglan
- Yaz
* Please note that recovery results vary per client. The recovery amounts in each case reflect the specific facts of that case. Further, recovery amounts in past cases are not a guarantee of future results.